Change Orders in Contractor Services
Change orders are formal modifications to an executed construction or service contract that adjust scope, cost, schedule, or all three simultaneously. This page covers how change orders are defined, structured, and processed across residential, commercial, and industrial contractor engagements. Understanding change orders is essential for anyone involved in contractor procurement, project oversight, or dispute resolution, because unmanaged changes are a leading driver of cost overruns and contractual conflict.
Definition and scope
A change order is a written amendment to an original contract between an owner and a contractor — or between a general contractor and a subcontractor — that modifies the work as originally defined in the contract documents. The American Institute of Architects (AIA), in its standard form AIA Document A201–2017 (General Conditions of the Contract for Construction), defines a change order as "a written instrument signed by the Owner, Contractor, and Architect" that authorizes a change in the work, contract sum, or contract time (AIA A201–2017, §7.2).
Change orders apply broadly across project types. On residential projects, they might document an owner-requested finish upgrade. On commercial projects, they frequently address unforeseen structural conditions uncovered during demolition. On government contracts, federal procurement rules under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), specifically FAR Part 43, govern the authority and process for issuing contract modifications (FAR Part 43).
The scope of a change order can encompass additions to the work, deletions from the work, substitutions of materials or methods, changes to the contract completion date, and adjustments to the total contract price. Not every field instruction rises to the level of a change order — minor clarifications that fall within the original scope of work are typically handled without a formal amendment.
How it works
The change order process follows a structured sequence from initiation through execution:
- Identification — A party (owner, contractor, architect, or engineer) identifies that the work differs from the contract scope. This triggers a change event.
- Request for Change (RFC) or Proposed Change Order (PCO) — The initiating party submits a written description of the requested change along with preliminary cost and schedule impact estimates.
- Pricing and review — The contractor prepares a detailed cost breakdown, including labor, materials, equipment, subcontractor costs, overhead, and profit. Overhead and profit markups on change order work are typically negotiated at the contract stage; industry practice places combined markups in the range of 10–20%, though the contract controls the actual figure.
- Negotiation — The owner, architect, or contracting officer reviews the pricing and schedule impact. Disputes at this stage may be resolved by a Construction Change Directive (CCD) under AIA A201 §7.3, which allows the owner to direct work to proceed before full agreement on price.
- Execution — All required signatories execute the change order, making it a binding amendment to the contract.
- Documentation — The signed change order is incorporated into the project record, and the contract sum and schedule are updated accordingly.
The distinction between a Change Order and a Construction Change Directive is operationally significant: a Change Order requires full agreement and signatures from all parties, while a CCD can be issued unilaterally by the owner when the parties cannot agree on price or time, directing the contractor to proceed at risk of later resolution.
Common scenarios
Change orders arise from predictable categories of events across most project types:
- Differing site conditions — Subsurface conditions (rock, soil contamination, buried utilities) that differ materially from what the contract documents indicated. Federal construction contracts address these under FAR 52.236-2 (FAR 52.236-2).
- Owner-directed scope changes — An owner requests an upgraded material, additional room, or design modification after contract execution.
- Design errors and omissions — Incomplete or conflicting drawings require field resolution, which may carry cost implications depending on contract allocation of design risk.
- Code and regulatory changes — A jurisdiction issues an updated building code requirement mid-project that mandates additional work.
- Unforeseen hazardous materials — Discovery of asbestos, lead paint, or mold expands the scope beyond original safety compliance provisions.
- Acceleration directives — An owner directs expedited completion, requiring overtime premiums and revised payment schedules.
Decision boundaries
Not every change event should be processed as a formal change order, and the contractual framework defines the boundaries:
Within original scope vs. outside original scope — If a contractor's pricing already accounts for a particular condition or item, executing it is a contract obligation, not a change. The baseline is the contract type and structure: a lump sum contract shifts more risk to the contractor, while a cost-plus contract passes more cost variability to the owner.
Directed vs. constructive changes — A directed change is explicitly authorized in writing. A constructive change occurs when an owner's action (or inaction) effectively changes the contractor's work without a formal order — for example, issuing overly restrictive inspection standards that require rework. Constructive changes are recognized under federal contract law and in standard AIA documents as grounds for equitable adjustment.
Time limits for notice — Most contracts specify a notice period (commonly 21 days under AIA A201 §15.1.3) within which a contractor must submit written notice of a claim for additional cost or time. Failure to provide timely notice can waive the right to recover, making prompt documentation essential.
Pricing method options — Change order work may be priced by mutual agreement on a lump sum, on a unit-price basis, or on a time-and-materials basis with a defined not-to-exceed ceiling. The pricing method should be specified in the original contract to avoid disputes.
References
- AIA Document A201–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction — American Institute of Architects
- Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 43 — Contract Modifications — General Services Administration / FAR Council
- FAR 52.236-2 — Differing Site Conditions — General Services Administration / FAR Council
- ConsensusDocs 200 Standard Agreement and General Conditions Between Owner and Constructor — ConsensusDocs Coalition (alternative to AIA forms, used in public benchmarking of change order provisions)
- Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC) C-700 Standard General Conditions — EJCDC (widely used on infrastructure and civil projects for change order clause benchmarking)
Related resources on this site:
- Contractor Services Directory: Purpose and Scope
- How to Use This Contractor Services Resource
- Contractor Services: Topic Context